And our new game is now available to the public.
Energetic is a four-player cooperative challenge in which you work to decarbonize New York City by building 16 GW of carbon neutral energy by 2035 (in the Green New Deal version) or 2050 (in the standard version). You can build entirely with renewables (wind, water and solar), or, by doing research before construction, include advanced nuclear power or natural gas with carbon capture (CCS).
Info about Energetic spread thanks to researcher
Jesse Jenkins at the Harvard Kennedy School, who live-tweeted his play of our beta version in December. In our first production run of the game, which comes with a map board, three card decks, and 142 infrastructure pieces, we produced and sold 62 sets to players at organizations including Yale University, Nature Energy, NYSERDA, Con Ed, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and the British Government’s Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
Nine sets of a modified version, set in the fictional African country of Wakanda, are used in
Dr. Paulina Jaramillo’s Sustainable Energy for Developing Countries class at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, with two additional sets at Carnegie Mellon’s campus in Africa.
The game is an entertaining, effective learning tool, and can be played by anyone from teenagers to post docs. During development, Energetic has been tested and enjoyed by people ages 11 to 60; middle school students, MIT Ph.D.’s, former commodity traders, and leaders at environmental NGO’s.
Energetic is available at
$75 per set; US shipping is $15, and international shipping is $60. The Wakanda version is available on demand as well.
To donate a game to a New York City high school or local community group, sponsors can buy one/give one for $130. To order, payment can be made via PayPal or by check, on our partner’s online donation page at artistascitizen.org. Please also send your shipping address via Twitter direct message to @cityatlas or by email to email@example.com.
Can you keep the lights on in NYC in 2030?
Feedback from energy experts Jesse Jenkins, Scott Burger and Max Luke (of MIT and the Harvard Kennedy School) “Our career-long aspirations achieved in one night!” “There are certain components of this that are super accurate.”
Feedback from high school students at The Point, a youth center in the Bronx: “This game is perfect.”
An energy policy game group in Washington, DC: “We had an intro Wednesday with players with broad and comprehensive experience in the public, private and non-profit/advocacy sectors (including FERC, World Bank, UN, Tesla, et al.), domestic and international, large and small, with specialties in clean energy, climate, environment, economics and finance, development, policy, tech, business, and organizing – we loved the game and think it’s a terrific teaching, strategic thinking, and team-building tool.” John Hansen, Paradigm Project
Ordering info and comments updated 8/10/19.)
High school students from The Point rapidly build a new energy system at the Institute for Sustainable Cities at Hunter College.
Players at Carnegie Mellon go to work. Juggling regions, money, and technology, while winning elections, is a challenge.
Dr. Paulina Jaramillo’s class at Carnegie Mellon plays the Wakanda version of Energetic.
Credits: The development of Energetic is a group effort by the
City Atlas teams of 2018/2019, and built on work by prior years of City Atlas researchers. Game mechanics by Truly Johnson and Connor Haseley, board design by Isil Akgul, card and piece design by Janet Tam, instruction design by Theo Miller, project coordination by Ashley Brown, trainers and V.2.0 team: Archie Kinnane and Theo Miller, creative director for City Atlas, Richard Reiss , team beta testers: Erik Berg, Bridget Scanlon, Luke McGinty. Energetic was made possible with logistical support from Douglas Price, Peter Marcotullio, and our partner The Institute for Sustainable Cities at Hunter College. Many thanks to Jesse Jenkins and Eric Hittinger for giving us notes on the prototype. Inspiration, David JC MacKay, FRS.
Sources: An educator’s guide is in the works to provide the background for the many metrics used in the game. For an overview, some broad sources will be listed here, along with the observation that there is an amazing level of clarity developing as more energy data resources and research material becomes available to the general public online. Here are 70:
Operating US Power Plants by Capacity, Age, and Fuel (Grubert 2018)
“The Green New Deal: The Enormous Opportunity in Shooting for the Moon” (Saul Griffith 2019)
Saul Griffith’s Climate Solution (Griffith 2012 YouTube 8 minutes)
“The Energy Problem – Following the Numbers” A talk at Stanford (Griffith 2018)
“1000 Cheeseburgers: A New Map of America’s Daily Energy Use” (Griffith 2016)
“Infrastructure and Climate Change” (Longnow.org| Griffith 2015)
Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5C – Summary for Policymakers (IPCC 2018)
Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency (NYC.gov 2013)
“Deadline 2020” (C40 Cities 2016)
Post Carbon Institute “Our Renewable Future” (Heinberg, Fridley 2017)
“Solar Energy in the Context of Energy Use, Energy Transportation, and Energy Storage” (MacKay 2013)
“Beyond Three Thirds: The Road to Deep Decarbonization” (BNEF Liebreich 2018)
“Flexible Power Grid Resources” (Barnhart 2012)
“Geophysical Constraints on the Reliability of Solar and Wind Power in the United States” (Caldeira 2018)
McKinsey “Global Energy Perspective 2019”
“Lazard: Levelized Cost of Energy, Levelized Cost of Storage 2018”
“Climate Change Clean Energy Policies Guide” (Vox 2019) and Interactive Energy Policy Simulator
“Electrification & Decarbonization: Exploring US Energy Use” (NREL 2017)
“Global Pumped Hydro Atlas” (Australian National University 2019)
“20M Boost for Business Innovators Powering the UK’s Hydrogen Economy” (UK.Gov BEIS 2018)
Sources on energy storage in EU, including hydrogen storage (Tom Brown 2019)
“Paris, An Air of Change” (Elioth 2015)
“Building the Political Mandate for Climate Action” (Rebecca Willis 2019)
“Percent for Climate: A Proposal for NYC” (City Atlas 2017)
“How the Public Got Behind Texas Wind Power” (Texas Tribune, 2013)
“Citizen Deliberation is the Gateway to a Better Politics” (The Economist 2019)
“Ireland Must Listen to Citizen’s Assembly on Climate Change” (The Irish Times, 2018)
“Citizens’ Assemblies: Guide to Democracy That Works” (Gerwin 2018)
“Naming the Problem: What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight Against Global Warming” (Skocpol, 2013)
“A New Agenda on Climate Change: Facing up to Stealth Denial and Winding Down on Fossil Fuels” (RSA/Jonathan Rowson, 2013)
“The Challenge of Communicating Unwelcome Climate Messages” (Tyndall Centre | Minns, Rayner 2015)
“Social Movement Theory and the Prospects for Climate Change Activism in the United States” (Doug McAdam, 2017)
“Cars, ‘Yellow Vests,’ and the Crisis of Democracy” (Lazare 2018)
“The Long Island Solar Farm” (US Department of Energy 2013)
“A Battle is Raging over the Largest Solar Farm East of the Rockies” (NPR 2019)
“Florida Utility to Close Natural Gas Plants, Build Massive Solar-Powered Battery” (ArsTechnica 2019)
“Powerlines: The Next ‘Green New Deal’ Battlefront?” (E & E New, 2019)
“US Withdraws from Wind Energy Power Line Project” (Reuters 2018)
“How the Nuclear ‘Dread’ Zone Handicaps Public Support” (Axios 2019)
“Quantifying the Hurricane Risk to Offshore Wind Turbines” (Rose et al 2012)
“Britain Has Gone Nine Days Without Wind Power” (Bloomberg 2018)
“‘Unprecedented’: Energy Operator in Daily Fight to Keep Lights On” (Sydney Morning Herald, 2019)
“Solar, Wind, and Nuclear: South Africa’s New Electricity Plan” (NYT 2011)”Solar, Wind, and Nuclear: South Africa’s New Electricity Plan” (NYT 2011)
“South Africa Crippled by Rolling Blackouts, Weeks Before an Election” (NYT 2019)
“Shareholders Approve 2GW Snowy 2.0 Pumped Storage for Australia” (Hydroworld 2019)
Blenheim-Gilboa Pumped Storage Power Station [New York State] (Wikipedia)
“New England’s Largest Battery is Hidden Inside a Mass. Mountain” (WBUR 2016)
“Projecting the Future Levelized Cost of Electricity Storage Technologies” (Schmidt et al. 2019)
“Minnesota Study Finds It Cheaper to Curtail Solar than to Add Storage” (Utility Dive 2019)
“Nuclear Power in the Age of the Green New Deal” (Wisconsin Public Radio 2019)
“Nuclear Power Paves the Only Viable Path Forward on Climate Change” (Hansen, Emanuel, Caldeira, Wigley, Guardian 2015)
“Burden of Proof: Renewables and Nuclear Power” (Brown 2018)
“The Two Key Questions About Going to 100% Renewables in Los Angeles” (Utility Dive 2018)
“Net Zero Energy Systems” (Davis et al. 2018)
“California’s Energy Future – The View to 2050” (California Council on Science and Technology 2011)
“Paying for Energy Transitions: Public Perspectives and Acceptability” (UK Energy Research Centre 2019)
“The Hottest Climate Trends of 2019” (SITRA/Granlund 2019)
Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project (2015)
“Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air” (MacKay 2009)
“The Simplest Way to Build Trust” (Desteno Harvard Business Review 2014)
“Even Arbitrary Norms Influence Social Decision Making” (Pryor 2018)
“Handing on a Sustainable Future” (Nature 2014)
“Cooperating with the Future” (Hauser et al. 2014)
“Climate Change Public Conversation Series | Desk Review” (Scottish Government 2016)
“The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness” (Aron et al. 1996) and “The 36 Questions That Lead to Love” (NYT 2015)
“Was Freud a Minivan or SUV Type of Guy?” (NYT 2000)
“To Support a Stronger Climate Movement, Focus Research on Building Collective Power” (Han, Barnett-Loro 2018)
“Mainstreaming Low-Carbon Lifestyles” (Climate Outreach 2019)
“2000 Watt Society: When the Future Becomes Reality” (Swiss.info 2016)
Energetic is a co-production of artistascitizen.org. ©2019 City Atlas/AAC